The Challenges of Free Speech
Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010News.Bookweb.org | November 18, 2010
By Chris Finan
Why in the world would anyone defend a book like The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure: A Child-Lover’s Code of Conduct?
A number of people asked me this during the recent controversy over Amazon.com’s decision to sell the book. (The book is no longer available from Amazon.) When I was quoted in an AP story saying the book appeared to be neither obscene nor child pornography and was therefore protected by the First Amendment, several outraged people wrote to me and members of the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression board to complain. How could we defend a book that hurts children?

In 1930, a man named Daniel Lord wrote a Production Code for American motion pictures. He included specific prohibitions: “Dances suggesting indecent passions,” he wrote, “are forbidden.” But Lord’s general point was to ensure that American films didn’t glorify that which was morally wrong and that they always had a happy ending. Movies would be a source of uplift. “No picture shall be produced,” he wrote, “that will lower the moral standards of those who see it.”
Jonathan Reck said his 14-year-old daughter was on the waiting list for days to check out Vegan Virgin Valentine from the Quitman Junior High library.
Something 10th graders at Nathan Hale High School in Seattle did was so upsetting to a student and her mom that it’s resulted in a curriculum change at the school, and apologies from the principal.