Internet Freedom Starts at Home: U.S. needs to practice what it preaches online

Rebecca MacKinnon | April 3, 2012

“An electronic curtain has fallen around Iran,” U.S. President Barack Obama warned in a recent video message marking the Persian New Year. Government censorship and surveillance, he said, make it more difficult for Iranians to “access the information that they want,” denying “the rest of the world the benefit of interacting with the Iranian people.”

Implied though not explicit in Obama’s remarks was the idea that if Iran’s Internet were freer and more open, Iran’s relationship with the world generally — and the United States in particular — would be different. Cases like Iran are the main driver of Washington’s bipartisan consensus around the idea that a free and open global Internet is in the United States’ strategic interest.

Yet more than two years after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave her first speech declaring “Internet freedom” to be a major component of U.S. foreign policy, it turns out that many of the most sophisticated tools used to suppress online free speech and dissent around the world are actually Made in the USA. American corporations are major suppliers of software and hardware used by all sorts of governments to carry out censorship and surveillance — and not just dictatorships.

View entire article

Tags: , ,

One Response to “Internet Freedom Starts at Home: U.S. needs to practice what it preaches online”

  1. Eric Stroshane says:

    Sadly, it’s not just the fact that we manufacture the tools of surveillance and censorship and sell them to oppressive regimes (directly or otherwise). We’ve also been setting some terrible legislative examples. You can’t champion free and open internet access abroad when you embrace censorship and universal surveillance at home.